Russell Eberst's observations of Feb 9 UTC reveal that Bjorn Gimle's of Feb 8 were too late by about 10 s - probably a reduction error of some sort. It is no big deal, and hopefully Bjorn will be able to recover the correct times. In the meantime, I have scrapped my elset of epoch 05039.75403202, which was based on the erroneous data, and produced this new one for the following day: USA 129 15.0 3.0 0.0 5.3 v 1 24680U 96072A 05040.84128935 .00011463 00000-0 15000-3 0 00 2 24680 98.0050 105.6902 0532050 209.4747 147.5473 14.72429420 01 Arc 2005 Feb 07.82 - 09.86, WRMS residuals = 0.018 deg Description of 2-line elements: http://www.satobs.org/element.html Ted Molczan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive: http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 10 2005 - 16:29:15 EST