[ADMIN} Topics: SeeSat-L vs Columbia-L

From: Ted Molczan (molczan@rogers.com)
Date: Sun Feb 09 2003 - 05:18:27 EST

  • Next message: Vitek, Antonin: "RCC leading edge schematics"

    The thread "Columbia in-orbit debris tracked" has resulted in posts suggesting
    that Columbia-L would be the better venue.
    This post is on topic for both lists, but I too would have chosen SeeSat-L,
    because it is more likely to result in meaningful comment on the credibility
    of the report, and why the object, if real, has yet to be catalogued. If the
    object proves to be real, then it will become especially interesting to
    In *very rare* cases, it may even be appropriate to cross-post.
    If you are uncertain as to which list to use, please feel free to ask me for
    guidance; otherwise, please use your best judgement.
    Please do not send messages to the lists regarding the topicality of posts. If
    you believe that someone has sent an off-topic message for either list, then
    please send me an e-mail. If I agree, then I will take action.
    Ted Molczan
    Admin, SeeSat-L
    Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe'
    in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@satobs.org

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 09 2003 - 05:30:30 EST