At 10:35 PM 04/02/00 EST, Mir16609@aol.com wrote: >I hope that you meant that OCS was traveling N->S and that the UNID was >traveling in the opposite direction (S->N). If so, Cosmos 1603 seems to be a >pretty good fit. > Yes the Unid was travelling S->N, the opposite direction to OCS and looking at it's track, Cosmos 1603 #15333 84106A fits. Thanks Don Jari ----------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe' in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org http://www2.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 04 2000 - 21:17:26 PST