RE: North Korean Satellite (was: Re: Seesat-l Digest, Vol 35, Issue 16)

From: Ted Molczan (ssl3molcz@rogers.com)
Date: Mon Dec 24 2012 - 06:07:48 UTC

  • Next message: Tony Beresford: "satobs dec 25 @ 8597"

    Jonathan W wrote:
    
    > Apologies for reviving an old thread, but is it reasonable to suggest that
    > this was both a missile test (proving that they are capable of delivering a
    > payload a substantial distance downrange), and also to demonstrate that
    > they can, at the very least, place an object into a desired orbit?  And if
    > they were to go to the trouble of placing an object into orbit, you would
    > think they would actually place a transceiver on the object, if not an
    > actual functional payload.  Since this is North Korea we are talking about,
    > the possibility of propaganda value cannot be immediately discounted.
    
    The political aspects are interesting and important, but off-topic on SeeSat-L. We may develop certain information
    through observation and orbit analysis that could help inform political discussion and debate, but that should take
    place in appropriate forums.
    
    Ted Molczan
    Admin
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    Seesat-l mailing list
    http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 24 2012 - 18:26:51 UTC