Re: GOES-12 deorbit?

From: Chris Jones (clj@panix.com)
Date: Mon Aug 19 2013 - 23:40:52 UTC

  • Next message: Jonathan McDowell: "Re: GOES-12 deorbit?"

    On 8/19/2013 5:41 PM, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
    > I doubt it was a typo - I've seen 'deorbit' used in this sense more and
    > more over the past 10 years - a very unfortunate re-appropriation
    > of what was once a well-defined technical term. I agree that 're-orbit' is
    > preferable, although still ugly.  Perhaps 'de-station' might be better?
    > (given that people are unwilling to type something fuller like  'send to a
    > retirement orbit')
    >
    > On 19 August 2013 17:35, Brian Weeden <brian.weeden@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    >> The appropriate (but still confusing) term is "re-orbit".  Perhaps it was a
    >> typo.
    
    I don't like "re-orbit" (with or without the hyphen) for the same reason 
    I don't like "deorbit": the satellite is neither reentering or leaving 
    orbit, so the terms are incorrect.  "de-station" is better.  If we don't 
    mind verbing another word, perhaps "graveyarding" (the gerund form of 
    the verb "to graveyard") would do.
    
    _______________________________________________
    Seesat-l mailing list
    http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 19 2013 - 23:41:45 UTC