Re: Admin: policy for reporting high resolution ground-based imageryof Earth satellites

From: Ralf Vandebergh (ralf.vandebergh@home.nl)
Date: Thu Aug 12 2010 - 08:21:32 UTC

  • Next message: Ralf Vandebergh: "Re: Admin: policy for reporting high resolution ground-based imageryof Earth satellites"

    I would go so far as to say it is a requirement to always provide
    > raw frames. That way, others can do their own processing. This
    > has multiple benefits.
    
    Although I have no problems myself to provide raw data in cases when
    something looks questionable, I think setting this as a requirement 
    will not lead to a free atmosphere and great stimulation posting the 
    imagery on the list at all, especially because most photographers are 
    amateurs and do this not for living.  Honestly, even in a more 
    professional environment we should respect when someone decides to 
    keep raw data or even imaging data internal and not provide it to the 
    public; researchers and students sometimes work on projects concerning 
    development of optical imaging and image processing techniques for 
    thesis or scientific publications were it is highly recommended to not 
    publish an a list. 
    
    
    Best regards,
    Ralf Vandebergh
    -------------- next part --------------
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    URL: http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/private/seesat-l/attachments/20100812/82391403/attachment.html 
    _______________________________________________
    Seesat-l mailing list
    http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 12 2010 - 08:25:29 UTC