Bjorn Gimle pointed out that with my obs of 80- 98 B was something wrong. Indeed it was. Bjorn wrote: > 80-98B was a real shot in the dark !? > I don't see the times add up to 160.2 > If 40 s period, your accuracy looks like +-10s, not +-0.2 > 35.5 looks better. Looking at the half-period, I get 17.78 > and your accuracy is +-0.04, disregarding one (secondary?) flash (and the > one you didn't post, which I added at 160.2 in 80-98B2). > I did discard a last timing of 18.15 sec. But in substracting it from the total time of 2min 40.36 sec I came up with 2min 40.18 sec in stead of 2 min 22.21 sec. Have to go back to school? The correct PPAS entry is: 80- 98 B 05-08-17 21:39:28 LB 142.2 0.2 4 35.6 Ff, 4(6)->i Timings: 35.48 [53.41 17.77] [18.16 17.39] sec. Some maxima not seen due to a white glow from an almost full moon. This is in good agree with Bjorn's analyse. Greetings and clear, dark skies Leo Barhorst, Medemblik NL Cospar 4252 52.76350 N 5.09114 E 2 m ASL http://www.home.versatel.nl/leobarhorst/index.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive: http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 20 2005 - 06:07:21 EDT