my first attempt at reporting obs in IOD format (please help)

From: Stephan Szyman (szymanss@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Aug 09 2005 - 06:33:57 EDT

  • Next message: astro: "I saw STS-114"

    earlier this evening,  I had the old dog,  suzie, in the backyard.  the poor 
    thing's been suffering from an unpleasant digestive problem.  something 
    positive resulted from this: lying on the hammock, waiting for her to do her 
    business, I caught sight of an object just as it crossed through the swan.
    
    I later ID'd it as NOAA 17,  using calsky.  here is a diagram of the pass 
    from HA:
    
    http://www.heavens-above.com/passgif.exe?T=-5&FOV=60&RA=307.120254390959&Dec=45.4099714963913&RAInc=60&DecInc=10&TimeInc=15&SatName=NOAA+17&Width=500&Height=500&STime=38573.1479189988&Lat=41.684&Lng=-87.700&Line1=1+27453U+02032A+++05220%2E29620339++%2E00000203++00000%2D0++10788%2D3+0++4831&Line2=2+27453+098%2E6585+293%2E0158+0010918+263%2E1869+096%2E8079+14%2E23690699162250
    
    I'll first describe the pass in english and then make my first attempt to 
    express that info in IOD format.  I would appreciate any corrections and/or 
    comments.
    
    I was looking around cygnus, working on my memorization of the names of the 
    stars it contains.  suddenly I caught sight of an object growing fairly 
    rapidly in brightness, just as it passed next to 42 cygni;  at the moment it 
    crossed an imaginary line between deneb and sadr,  I looked at my watch and 
    got a reading of 03:32:54 UTC (9 aug 2005).  by the time I looked back to 
    the object it had grown in brightness to surpass that of deneb (mag. 1.25.)
    
    it continued to grow in brightness, at about the same rate as an iridium 
    does when flaring to -1 or 0 mag, however it continued at this rate for much 
    longer and therefore grew brighter.  it had to have peaked near -4.5 to -5.5 
    mag.,  it was among the brightest non-iridium flares I've seen.  peak 
    brightness occurred at approximately 03:33:15 UTC as the spacecraft crossed 
    an imagined line between 33 cygni and deneb.
    
    by 03:33:30 UTC it had faded back down to positive magnitude numbers, 
    probably above 2.5 mag., and within 2 seconds time to either side of theta 
    cephei it had gone dark and disappeared completely from view.  I followed 
    its course after it went dark and looked at my watch the moment it should 
    have crossed another imagined line, this one between epsilon draconis and 
    alderamin, at 03:33:45 UTC.
    
    ok, here goes the fun part:
    
    
    27453 02 032A   ???? P 20050809033243      58 25 2029547+362829 28 S+025
    27453 02 032A   ???? P 20050809033254      58 25 2028693+420159 28 S+008
    27453 02 032A   ???? P 20050809033315      58 25 2028126+525876 28 M-050
    27453 02 032A   ???? P 20050809033330      58 25 2029612+600163 28 S+026
    27453 02 032A   ???? P 20050809033334      58 25 2029203+612125 28 N+045
    27453 02 032A   ???? P 20050809033345      58 25 2029671+664941 28 D
    
    I have placed question marks instead of data where I do not understand the 
    description of the columns. I am working with the IOD format description at 
    url:
    
    http://www.satobs.org/position/IODformat.html
    
    questions:
    
    1. how do I determine my four-digit station number (cols. 17-20)?
    
    2. in column 66, "optical behavior code," was I incorrect to put S for 
    steady when the brightness was increasing and decreasing?  perhaps this 
    should have been I for irregular? I wasn't certain which to put.
    
    clear skies!
    
    stephan szyman
    chicago IL USA
    41.6840N, 87.7000W; 188m asl
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive:  
    http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 09 2005 - 06:44:49 EDT