Wayne > Not my first observations, but the first ones I'm going to post. My > feeling is that I am overestimating errors, but better that than the > other way. I haven't cc'd these to anyone; not sure who wants them. > Do I need to cc them? How do I know? Check the archives? > > 21949 92 023A 8333 E 20000824013856370 27 25 2253270+655510 68 S+055 > I've analysed this and your other 7 observations of 92-23A, along with 17 others by three experienced UK observersand they are excellent! Only one shows a mistake in position. Here the the residuals, showing the corrections needed in RA(in min) and Dec(in '), and the cross-track error(in ') and along-track error (in sec). 8333 -0.73 +5.3 +6.8 +0.06 8333 +0.57 +0.7 -2.9 +0.15 8333 -0.40 +2.6 +4.5 +0.03 8333 -0.13 -1.4 +0.7 -0.07 8333 +0.45 +1.3 -5.4 +0.10 8333 -0.08 +0.1 +1.1 -0.01 8333 -60.29 -7.5 +850.1 -8.19 ** 8333 -0.51 +2.2 +7.7 +0.02 > Hope I haven't made any big mistakes. Please advise. > As I say, only one big mistake, which is pretty good going. Keep up the good work! David David M Brierley Malvern, Worcestershire, UK Station 2675, 52.1358N 2.3264W 70m davidbrierley@waitrose.com -- The Information contained in this E-Mail and any subsequent correspondence is private and is intended solely for the intended recipient(s). For those other than the recipient any disclosure, copying, distribution, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on such information is prohibited and may be unlawful. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe' in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org http://www2.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 25 2000 - 01:14:56 PDT