Sherry, What you saw was the NOSS 2-1 triplet: NOSS 2-1 (E) 3.0 2.0 0.0 5.9 v 4.0 1 20642U 90050E 99185.14630959 .00000030 00000-0 47756-4 0 06 2 20642 63.4240 78.3359 0215999 352.7527 7.2473 13.40316656 04 NOSS 2-1 (C) 3.0 2.0 0.0 5.9 v 4.0 1 20691U 90050C 99176.93929783 .00000040 00000-0 63595-4 0 03 2 20691 63.4240 99.9163 0217000 1.9424 358.0576 13.40315520 04 NOSS 2-1 (D) 3.0 2.0 0.0 5.9 v 4.0 1 20692U 90050D 99185.14643788 .00000030 00000-0 47390-4 0 09 2 20692 63.4240 79.0054 0222000 1.5419 358.4580 13.40316370 02 You can read about these at http://www.fas.org/spp/military/program/surveill/sbwass_n.htm Ralph McConahy 34.8829N 117.0064W 670m > -----Original Message----- > From: SDU2828@aol.com [SMTP:SDU2828@aol.com] > Sent: Friday, August 13, 1999 8:32 AM > To: SeeSat-L@blackadder.lmsal.com > Subject: an unusual sighting > > There was a break in the clouds here at 3a.m. to look for the meteors. We > saw > 43 in just 25 mins before the clouds started to fill back in. At around > 3:45a.m. CDT we saw 3 satellites coming out of the western sky at about 70 > > degrees high.They were traveling to the north. The unusaul thing is that > they > were traveling in a triangular formation. When I first spotted them, it > appeared as if a constellation was moving! > I would estimate the brightness at about a +5 magnitute. There were 3 > people > in my group who all saw the same thing, so it wasn't my imagination. They > certainly looked like satellites and not planes.(no colored lights or > noise) > But could this have actually been satellites? I would appreciate any of > your > thoughts on what we saw. > Thanks, Sherry Underhill > 41.85 degrees N 87.65 degrees W