Ed Cannon wrote: >> >>I have not been able to find an estimated *time* for that decay. >>The following element set was issued shortly before 21 July (if I'm >>calculating the date correctly). >> >> 23957 >> 1 23957U 94029E 96202.83639925 +.03826735 -11202-5 +29067-2 0 00065 >> 2 23957 082.2549 144.8276 0040729 268.8460 090.8162 16.13139585114381 >> >>I'm not sure, but I don't think I saw this one listed in anyone's decay >>predictions. Were any decay elsets published anywhere? >> In my table of recent decays, http://www.algonet.se/~b_gimle/recent.htm I have : "guess" NASA SatEvo 23957 82.24 94029E 960722.52 960721 960725 and in : http://www.algonet.se/~b_gimle/gif/23957.gif (960723) Mean Motion plot (the SatEvo prediction was made before Alan Pickup's vacation) i.e. my decay estimate after the last elset I found (same as above) was about July 22 at 12:30 UT ! I do not usually create elsets of my own. ------------------------------------------------------------ -- b_gimle@algonet.se +46-8-7428086 (home) -- -- 59.22371 N, 18.22857 E AND member of : -- -- http://www.algonet.se/~b_gimle seesat-l / seesat-d -- -- bjorn@tt-tech.se +46-8-59095789 (office)-- ------------------------------------------------------------ Join us at Eurosom 2, the Satellite Observers Meeting: Oct.19/20 ! Ghent, Belgium http://www.rzg.mpg.de/~bdp/eurosom.html ---