Re: Starlink 1203 is Bright

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Anthony Mallama via Seesat-l <seesat-l_at_satobs.org>
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2021 19:25:25 -0400

This satellite is now about 2 km below the Starlinks that precede and
follow it. Can anyone comment on the rate of decay for such a satellite at
545 km altitude?

Thanks,
Tony Mallama
_______________________________________________
Seesat-l mailing list
http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l

Received on Sat Apr 03 2021 - 18:26:19 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Russell Eberst via Seesat-l: "2021APR3.OBS"
Previous message: JAY RESPLER via Seesat-l: "STARLINK 20-57 20-88 21-5 21-9 21-12 21-21"
Maybe in reply to: JAY RESPLER via Seesat-l: "Re: Starlink 1203 is Bright"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sat Apr 03 2021 - 23:26:19 UTC