Ah, that's right, I completely forgot about the early jettison of the orbital module. Thanks Jonathan. For some reason the label "Shenzhou-11 Module" made me think it was implying the whole vehicle, and the orbital module didn't occur to me...which seems silly in hindsight. My apologies to Scott, et al. I was also going off of a potentially erroneous memory about ISS...where Spacetrack maintained separate Object ID's for ISS as a whole and for Zarya for a few years after SM arrival, so one could be misled that Zarya was not attached. Does this ring a bell for anyone, or am I off my rocker? Anyway, thinking of that, I wondered if this was a case of a "phantom" Shenzhou element set similar to that phantom Zarya element set. Obviously OBE now. Since I brought up Tianzhou-1...it rolled out to the launch pad, and Chinese media reports launch is planned between Thursday and Monday. Tom -----Original Message----- From: Seesat-l [mailto:seesat-l-bounces+tom.m.erkenswick=nasa.gov_at_satobs.org] On Behalf Of Tristan Cools via Seesat-l Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2017 2:06 AM Cc: SeeSat-L <SeeSat-L_at_satobs.org> Subject: Re: formation flying Tiangong 2 16-57A/41765 with ? Yes, Perigee from the Shenzhou 11 orbital module is some 20km lower than Tiangong 2, I would have expected to be much further away along its track, but it was indeed 16061G/41868. gr, Tristan Cools BWGS 2017-04-09 0:09 GMT+02:00 Jonathan McDowell via Seesat-l < seesat-l_at_satobs.org>: > Shenhzou 11 landed, but unlike for Soyuz the orbital module is > jettisoned before retrofire and remains in orbit. > So it is that. > > On 8 April 2017 at 17:13, Erkenswick, Tom M. (JSC-CM341) via Seesat-l > < seesat-l_at_satobs.org> wrote: > > > Shenzhou-11 undocked and landed back in November 2016, so it's not that. > > > > I see no words in the English-language Chinese press to indicate > > that > > Tianzhou-1 was launched. And the Chinese have been pretty > > non-secretive with their human spaceflight launches and events for > > several years, including live launch feeds. > > > > Maybe it's the Banxing-2 microsat that they released in October > > while > > Shenzhou-11 was docked, the one that took images of the > > Tiangong+Shenzhou stack? > > > > Tom > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Seesat-l [mailto:seesat-l-bounces+tom.m.erkenswick > =nasa.gov_at_satobs. > > org] On Behalf Of Scott Tilley via Seesat-l > > Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2017 3:26 PM > > To: seesat-l_at_satobs.org > > Subject: Re: formation flying Tiangong 2 16-57A/41765 with ? > > > > This would be Shenzhou-11 Module, 41868, 16-016G. Object is shows up > > in today's spacetrack data. > > > > s > > > > > > On 4/8/2017 12:53 PM, Tristan Cools via Seesat-l wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Only the second time I observed the Chinese Space station as I get > > > only low passes here over Belgium, but what a surprise; another > > > object was flying synchronous some 2deg SE of it. Brightness > > > about mag +1 and the other object maybe +3. Observation time 19:36UTC. > > > > > > Can somebody confirm this or is there any news ? > > > > > > I took some pictures of it, but with allmost full moon I would be > > > surprised if I could catch the two objects. > > > > > > gr, tristan cools > > > Belgian Working Group Satellites/BWGS > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Seesat-l mailing list > > > http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Seesat-l mailing list > > http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Seesat-l mailing list > > http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l > > > _______________________________________________ > Seesat-l mailing list > http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l > _______________________________________________ Seesat-l mailing list http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l _______________________________________________ Seesat-l mailing list http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-lReceived on Tue Apr 18 2017 - 16:56:49 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Apr 18 2017 - 21:56:50 UTC