As implied by the field before the S(teady) and R(egular), the two middle #30587 obs are inaccurate appulses, and the third #29393 is a more accurate 90-deg 5% split of a 2 deg pair. Its period may mave been 15-20 sec? For #26934, I was quite uncertain about the star ID's when I wrote my notes (don't have my voice recorder at 5918) 30587 07 005B 5918 G 20070415214133120 17 25 1931859+234684 68 S 30587 07 005B 5918 G 20070415214144730 17 25 1944211+253636 19 S 30587 07 005B 5918 G 20070415214159620 17 25 2000635+275550 19 S 30587 07 005B 5918 G 20070415214221880 17 25 2027097+310813 78 S 29393 06 037A 5918 G 20070415215751200 17 25 2022443+323858 78 R 29393 06 037A 5918 G 20070415215808190 17 25 2046803+351386 88 R 29393 06 037A 5918 G 20070415215839480 17 25 2134836+383715 28 R 26934 01 044A 5918 G 20070415220831690 17 25 2048432+440046 39 S 26934 01 044A 5918 G 20070415220901580 17 25 2212433+464800 39 S 30588 07 005C 5918 G 20070415222403300 17 25 1925074+280446 48 S The observations above are, as I always do, reported in IOD format: http://www.satobs.org/position/IODformat.html -- Björn Gimle -- -- COSPAR 5918 WGS84, +18.10127 (E), +59.29813 (N), 44 m -- -- COSPAR 5919, MALMA, +18.6206 (E), +59.2615 (N), 33 m -- -- COSPAR 5920, FRUVIK,+18.4820 (E), +59.3260 (N), 11 m -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive: http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 16 2007 - 03:25:25 EDT