My "IGS 1A" 2 min early was ADEOS 2 rk, all splits except the first were incorrectly identified. Using Ted's new elset for IGS 1B I find that two of the three, that I didn't believe in, appear correct - the first one was apparantly to a closer, +6.81 mag star. My notes said 58% from the upper, 48% from the upper, 1/15 from the lower. Accuracy leaves some to desired - my second split is below the prediction, but the other two above. NNNNN YY LLLABC SSSS C YYYYMMDDHHMMSSsss tt ce HHMMmmm+DDMMmm pp 27601 02 056E 5919 G 20030425200157000 17 25 1317400+550800 19 27601 02 056E 5919 G 20030425200227800 17 25 1327500+721700 58 27601 02 056E 5919 G 20030425200310300 17 25 2337000+861800 38 27601 02 056E 5919 G 20030425200340700 17 25 0047100+745300 18 27699 03 009B 5919 G 20030425205945900 17 25 0751400+262800 28 27699 03 009B 5919 G 20030425210015400 17 25 0714700+303600 38 27699 03 009B 5919 G 20030425210040500 17 25 0600000+371600 28 -- bjorn.gimle@tietotech.se (office) -- -- b_gimle@algonet.se (home) http://www.algonet.se/~b_gimle -- -- COSPAR 5919, MALMA, 59.2576 N, 18.6172 E, 23 m -- -- COSPAR 5918, HAMMARBY, 59.2985 N, 18.1045 E, 44 m -- ----- Original Message ----- > 1B was about time predicted, but again I can't make the splits fit. ... > are too far right of the Beehive and Pollux on the first two > > > IGS 1A was 116 s early on this elset (site 5919). > > Although I am not certain about these splits, the first one was done at > > 1-power between zeta and eta Uma, and the last one was in a tight pair > of > > rather bright stars (inclination may be higher?). And I couldn't find > any > > match for my third split! ----------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from SeeSat-L, send a message with 'unsubscribe' in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@satobs.org List archived at http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 26 2003 - 06:40:24 EDT