SV: Consideration of a OIG/GSFC SSR policy change

From: Bjoern Gimle (b_gimle@algonet.se)
Date: Thu Apr 13 2000 - 22:54:58 PDT

  • Next message: Mir16609@aol.com: "OIG Message"

    I assume that the date of the first 2xxxx elset for a debris object can be
    accuretely enough "interpolated" from known launches.
    But the object may have a month or more of pre-history as an 8yyyy object,
    and the analysts at USSPACECOM who give it a catalog no. and an
    international ID must have a pretty good idea when the separation from the
    parent occurred.
    
    This date would be much more valuable to have in the listing.
    
    -- bjorn.gimle@tietotech.se (office)                         --
    -- b_gimle@algonet.se (home)  http://www.algonet.se/~b_gimle --
    -- COSPAR 5919, MALMA,    59.2615 N, 18.6206 E, 33 m         --
    -- COSPAR 5918, HAMMARBY, 59.2985 N, 18.1045 E, 44 m         --
    -- SeeSat-L / Visual Satellite Observer Home Page found at   --
    -- http://www2.satellite.eu.org/satintro.html      --
    
    
    ....
    >
    > Thus when a new item is received from USSPACECOM, and it is a debris
    > object. I believe it would be a simple program revision to "look" at
    > the epoch date and accept this as the realization, calving, discovery
    > or detection date (I like the term "calving date").  And since the
    > term is specific.  It is an easy matter for SSR users to immediately
    > know _when_ a debris object appeared...no guess work.
    >
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe'
    in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org
    http://www2.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 13 2000 - 22:56:40 PDT