Re: AW: Super tracking device at SpaceCom?

From: Thomas A. Troszak (tom@bullhammer.com)
Date: Thu Apr 13 2000 - 16:17:35 PDT

  • Next message: Ted Molczan: "99057C debris catalogued"

    > Atmospheric drag does not make such objects "fall behind", it makes them hurry on ahead.
    > -----------------------------------------------------------------
    > best wishes
    > Russell  Eberst
    
    Thanks for the reply!
    
    I am aware of the fact that the period of an orbit decreases as an
    object falls closer to earth, but it is also traveling in a smaller
    circle around each orbit, therefore it is covering less distance per rev
    as well, right?
    
    Air resistance that causes satellites to decay is the same air
    resistance that finally slows down re-entering manned capsules as well.
    The poor helpless communication sats are simply not prepared for the
    rigors of re-entry, they do not survive the heating of the initial
    deceleration, or they would all land intact somewhere.
    
    Ok, seriously now, how about we use the term "fall ahead".  Actually
    make sense to me, but I'm weird...
    
    Tom Troszak, Firedesign, Inc.
    Asheville, NC, USA
    35.601 N, -82.554 W
    elevation 2,300 ft.
    mailto:tom@bullhammer.com
    http://www.bullhammer.com/satphotos1.htm
    http://www.bullhammer.comEberst wrote:
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe'
    in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org
    http://www2.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 13 2000 - 16:14:58 PDT