Russell Eberst's Unknown of 4 April may be 99057C,or a new fragment of it.

From: Phillip Clark (psclark@dircon.co.uk)
Date: Sat Apr 08 2000 - 13:41:47 PDT

  • Next message: Bjoern Gimle: "Re(2): Russell's Unknown is NOT 99057C"

    On Sat, 8 Apr 2000, Daniel Deak wrote:
    > Ted Molczan wrote:
    > If 99057C has broken up, then I would think that NORAD would have released
    > some elements of fragments by now. The absence of such, argues against a
    > break-up.
    
    No break-up notices have been issued from the NASA JSC's orbital debris
    group for this objects, although I am aware that the chief scientist there
    has been out-of-town recently so there might be a delay.
    
    However, remember that following any break-up plenty of debris pieces 
    might be tracked which are either not immediately catalogued or never
    cataloged.   New debris can wait many months before it appears in the
    USSPACECOM listings - a problem which I believe to be more bureaucratic
    rather than a desire on anyone's part to withold the data.
    
    Phillip Clark
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Phillip S Clark                                     22 Winterbourne Close
    Molniya Space Consultancy                           Hastings
    Compiler/Publisher, Worldwide Satellite Launches    E Sussex  TN34 1XG
                                                        U.K.
    
    Specialist in "space archeology" - the older and more obscure the more 
    interesting it is !
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe'
    in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org
    http://www2.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 08 2000 - 13:40:51 PDT